I have been summarising the chapters of Brian McLaren's book 'A new kind of Christian' which we are reading and discussing in the midweek home gathering that I belong too. Here are my thoughts on chapters 4 & 5...
Chapters 4 & 5 are best read together and cover a lecture that Neo gives to some evangelical college students (chapter 4) and their Qs (chapter 5).
The crux of Neo’s lecture is that as with the change from the medieval period into the modern one that there are significant cultural, social, political, scientific and economic changes in both the 15th and 20th centuries that means the tide has changed in the west and a new phase of cultural identity is breaking upon us.
As with the tide I would say that we cannot be Canute’s and order it to turn back, nor on the other hand should we be swept out to sea, lost in the currents of societal change and transition. We need to learn not only how to swim but to know the shore line, understand the new ocean and that can only come from transformation by the Spirit from within and his navigation without.
For one excellent discussion on area raised with regard to chapter four may I recommend to this post and discussion by my friend and fellow small group member, Mark.
Practical Qs explored...
Are focus on chapter 5 was to move away from the theoretical for a moment and ask the question what does this mean for us and for our church…
Post modern - like learning a new language?
I suggested the metaphor of a learning a new language –we often read it as modernity and anti-modernity instead of post-modernity. Post doesn’t mean bad but what comes after and of course that means its built on a foundation of modernity.
I think we need to discover the joys of being bilingual - our children can do it I am sure but I think we struggle at the moment to be fluent in postmodernity - we keep switching back to modernity, translating it and then putting into a postmodernity style.
My wife who is a better linguist than I am tells me that you know you are fluent in another language when you can think in it without translating it back to your first tongue, so I have a long way to go.
I think it is why we react against modernity sometimes and yet struggle with postmodernity - the language of modernity is not adequate and yet we are not fluent enough to express what we mean in a postmodern context either…
lol, it’s is exciting but also frustrating at the same time, why structure and imagination are both good things - after all a language without a structure of how to write it called grammar would be a mare but without dreams, ideas, engagement to express using that language it would be very dull and technical… or in other words we read a great story and are inspired but we hardly notice the structure that allows us to enter in and participate across the pages…
What is cultural vineyard and what is post-modern about Vineyard Church Sutton?
This was an interesting discussion, in part having a perspective of experiencing a modern UK vineyard church and a more post modern one (thinking of the faith community that we belong to, Sutton Vineyard), a different experience from some folk who had come from a more traditional evangelical denomination. I have put some musings below, which are my own rather than anything official/binding (click on table for larger image):
Passing on the story
One concern that was raised was about whether we miss out on something by not have a more expository style of preaching – are we in other words bible-lite and suffering for it in terms of not being shaped by the God of the book as the community of the book. One thing I find fascinating about Jason is that he is super theologically minded (doctorate and all) but that his sermons are in the vineyard tradition of staring where people are in life rather than starting with a bible text. To listen to Jason’s teaching, I think, when you are aware of the story of the book is to here it echoed, explained and put into a context we can not only understand but also apply, even when we don’t realise how often it is filtered through and steeped in the bible (for example see my thoughts on Jase's brill kingdom of God series).
I have also reacted to the thought that we need more bible preached is often by those who know the bible well themselves and have experienced that style and enjoy that form of engagement – I am not sure we need more bible preached in the classic sense of the word but maybe more bible lived, internalising its truths and reproducing them in thought, word and deed. One of the hard things about the modern approach to bible preaching for me is that we have used it judge the world rather than letting the God of the book judge us – so we wonder about the few remaining taboo areas like gays where we are hyper critical and all for a bible based bashing whereas we are super uncritical of issues equally destructive like gossip or holding a grudge against our brother/sister.
One thing that struck me though as we forge forward into a post-modern world is how do we communicate the stories of the bible to our children? We who were shaped by systematic Sunday school classes and then systematic preaching had this laid out for us – church was designed to equip us with knowledge and to that end it succeeded well. The post-modern milieu would seem to be allowing us to be generous/gracious but to maybe not so deeply immersed in the stories of the book and connecting that with our ongoing story today.
Playlist for chapters 4 & 5
- What if (Coldplay)
- Comes a time (Nada Surf)
- Desire (Ryan Adams)
- Lost souls (Doves)
- City of blinding lights (U2)
Recent Comments