« What has church ever done for us..? | Main | Church as a 3rd place..? »

23 January 2008

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c89c753ef00e54fef45a08833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference what would you say church is..?:

Comments

fernando

Your last three - people, presence and practise (a great debate to be had there - practice, practise, or both). Place needs to be split, because place in terms of "the building" is not the same as place in terms of "the locality of mission."

For me, people, presence and practise should determine place (building), in the sense that form follows function. But, too often, we inherit the place, which then supervenes on the people, presence and practise.

Paul

Thanks F, so what would the debate be for you on practice/practise or both?

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

My Photo
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported

Your email address:


Powered by FeedBlitz

Blog powered by TypePad
AddThis Social Bookmark Button